core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8358095: Cleanup tests with explicit locale provider set to only CLDR [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358095: Cleanup tests with explicit locale provider set to only CLDR [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358095: Cleanup tests with explicit locale provider set to only CLDR [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8358095: Cleanup tests with explicit locale provider set to only CLDR [v3] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8358095: Cleanup tests with explicit locale provider set to only CLDR [v3] Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8358095: Cleanup tests with explicit locale provider set to only CLDR Justin Lu
• Re: RFR: 8337143: (fc, fs) Move filesystem-related native objects from libnio to libjava [v14] Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8358089: GenerateKeyList.java COMPAT removal update Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358089: Remove the GenerateKeyList.java test tool [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358089: Remove the GenerateKeyList.java test tool [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358089: Remove the GenerateKeyList.java test tool [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8358089: Remove the GenerateKeyList.java test tool Justin Lu
• Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v5] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v5] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v5] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v5] duke
• RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v2] Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v2] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v3] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8358015: Fix SequencedMap sequenced view method specifications Stuart Marks
• RFR: 8357882: Use UTF-8 encoded data in LocaleDataTest Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8357882: Use UTF-8 encoded data in LocaleDataTest Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8357882: Use UTF-8 encoded data in LocaleDataTest Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8357882: Use UTF-8 encoded data in LocaleDataTest Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8357882: Use UTF-8 encoded data in LocaleDataTest Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8358017: Various enhancements of jpackage test helpers Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8358017: Various enhancements of jpackage test helpers Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8358017: Various enhancements of jpackage test helpers Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8358017: Various enhancements of jpackage test helpers Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8358017: Various enhancements of jpackage test helpers Alexey Semenyuk
• Integrated: 8354724: Methods in java.io.Reader to read all characters and all lines Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13] Michael McMahon
• Re: RFR: 8282429: StringBuilder/StringBuffer.toString() skip compressing for UTF16 strings [v5] ExE Boss
• Integrated: 8357955: java.lang.classfile.Signature.ArrayTypeSig.of IAE not thrown for dims > 255 Adam Sotona
• RFR: 8356634: VectorShape#largestShapeFor should have public access Ian Graves
  • Re: RFR: 8356634: VectorShape#largestShapeFor should have public access Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8356634: VectorShape#largestShapeFor should have public access [v2] Ian Graves
  • Re: RFR: 8356634: VectorShape#largestShapeFor should have public access [v3] Ian Graves
  • Re: RFR: 8356634: VectorShape#largestShapeFor should have public access [v4] Ian Graves
  • Re: RFR: 8356634: VectorShape#largestShapeFor should have public access [v4] Ian Graves
  • Re: RFR: 8356634: VectorShape#largestShapeFor should have public access [v5] Ian Graves
  • Re: RFR: 8356634: VectorShape#largestShapeFor should have public access [v5] Paul Sandoz
  • Integrated: 8356634: VectorShape#largestShapeFor should have public access Ian Graves
• RFR: 8356047: [macos] jpackage produces confusing post- and pre- installation PKG scripts Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356047: [macos] jpackage produces confusing post- and pre- installation PKG scripts Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356047: [macos] jpackage produces confusing post- and pre- installation PKG scripts Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356047: [macos] jpackage produces confusing post- and pre- installation PKG scripts Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v4] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v4] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v4] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v4] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v4] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v4] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8353686: Optimize Math.cbrt for x86 64 bit platforms [v4] Julian Waters
• Re: RFR: 8357955: java.lang.classfile.Signature.ArrayTypeSig.of IAE not thrown for dims > 255 Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8357955: java.lang.classfile.Signature.ArrayTypeSig.of IAE not thrown for dims > 255 Adam Sotona
• Integrated: 8345431: Improve jar --validate to detect duplicate or invalid entries Henry Jen
• Re: RFR: 8328821: Map.of() derived view collection mutators should throw UnsupportedOperationException [v11] Liam Miller-Cushon
  • Re: RFR: 8328821: Map.of() derived view collection mutators should throw UnsupportedOperationException [v11] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328821: Map.of() derived view collection mutators should throw UnsupportedOperationException [v11] Liam Miller-Cushon
  • Re: RFR: 8328821: Map.of() derived view collection mutators should throw UnsupportedOperationException [v11] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8328821: Map.of() derived view collection mutators should throw UnsupportedOperationException [v11] Liam Miller-Cushon
• RFR: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15 Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15 Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15 Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15 Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8348328: Update IANA Language Subtag Registry to Version 2025-05-15 Justin Lu
• Integrated: 8354475: TestDockerMemoryMetricsSubgroup.java fails with exitValue = 1 PAWAN CHAWDHARY
• Integrated: 8334742: Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte' Gautham Krishnan
• Re: RFR: 8345431: Improve jar --validate to detect duplicate or invalid entries [v16] Henry Jen
  • Re: RFR: 8345431: Improve jar --validate to detect duplicate or invalid entries [v16] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8345431: Improve jar --validate to detect duplicate or invalid entries [v16] Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12] Michael McMahon
• Integrated: 8355022: Implement JEP 506: Scoped Values Andrew Haley
• RFR: 8357919: Arena::allocate returns segments with address zero if the segment length is zero after JDK-8345687 Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357919: Arena::allocate returns segments with address zero if the segment length is zero after JDK-8345687 Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8357919: Arena::allocate returns segments with address zero if the segment length is zero after JDK-8345687 Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: 8357919: Arena::allocate returns segments with address zero if the segment length is zero after JDK-8345687 Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357919: Arena::allocate returns segments with address zero if the segment length is zero after JDK-8345687 Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8351369: [macos] Use --install-dir option with DMG packaging Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8351369: [macos] Use --install-dir option with DMG packaging Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8351369: [macos] Use --install-dir option with DMG packaging Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8351369: [macos] Use --install-dir option with DMG packaging Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8351369: [macos] Use --install-dir option with DMG packaging Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8351369: [macos] Use --install-dir option with DMG packaging Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8351369: [macos] Use --install-dir option with DMG packaging [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8351369: [macos] Use --install-dir option with DMG packaging [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8351369: [macos] Use --install-dir option with DMG packaging Alexander Matveev
• RFR: 8357930: Amendment for JDK-8333664 Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357930: Amendment for JDK-8333664 Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357930: Amendment for JDK-8333664 [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357930: Amendment for JDK-8333664 [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357930: Amendment for JDK-8333664 [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8357930: Amendment for JDK-8333664 Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v2] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v3] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v3] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v3] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v4] Shaojin Wen
• Re: RFR: 8345431: Improve jar --validate to detect duplicate or invalid entries [v15] Henry Jen
  • Re: RFR: 8345431: Improve jar --validate to detect duplicate or invalid entries [v15] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8345431: Improve jar --validate to detect duplicate or invalid entries [v15] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8345431: Improve jar --validate to detect duplicate or invalid entries [v15] Lance Andersen
• Re: RFR: 8334742: Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte' [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8334742: Change java.time month/day field types to 'byte' [v2] duke
• Integrated: 8357145: CRC/Inflater/Deflater/Adler32 methods that take a ByteBuffer throw UOE if backed by shared memory segment Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8266013: Unexpected replacement character handling on stateful CharsetEncoder [v2] Edoardo Luppi
• Re: RFR: 8352565: Add native method implementation of Reference.get() [v7] Kim Barrett
• RFR: 8356553 : Incorrect uses of {@link} in AbstractQueuedLongSynchronizer and AbstractQueuedSynchronizer Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8356553 : Incorrect uses of {@link} in AbstractQueuedLongSynchronizer and AbstractQueuedSynchronizer Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8356553 : Incorrect uses of {@link} in AbstractQueuedLongSynchronizer and AbstractQueuedSynchronizer Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8356553 : Incorrect uses of {@link} in AbstractQueuedLongSynchronizer and AbstractQueuedSynchronizer Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8356553 : Incorrect uses of {@link} in AbstractQueuedLongSynchronizer and AbstractQueuedSynchronizer Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8356553 : Incorrect uses of {@link} in AbstractQueuedLongSynchronizer and AbstractQueuedSynchronizer Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8356553 : Incorrect uses of {@link} in AbstractQueuedLongSynchronizer and AbstractQueuedSynchronizer Viktor Klang
• Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal wenshao
  • Re: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8357808: Add a command line option for specifying a counter in TestRandomFloatingDecimal Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8357808: Add a command line option for specifying a counter in TestRandomFloatingDecimal [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8357808: Add a command line option for specifying a counter in TestRandomFloatingDecimal [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8357808: Add a command line option for specifying a counter in TestRandomFloatingDecimal Raffaello Giulietti
• RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView allocates Boolean boxes Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView allocates Boolean boxes Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView allocates Boolean boxes Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView allocates Boolean boxes ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView allocates Boolean boxes Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView allocates Boolean boxes Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8357798: ReverseOrderListView uses Boolean boxes after JDK-8356080 Aleksey Shipilev
• RFR: 8357797: Use StructuredTaskScopeImpl.ST_NEW for state init Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8357797: Use StructuredTaskScopeImpl.ST_NEW for state init Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357797: Use StructuredTaskScopeImpl.ST_NEW for state init [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8357797: Use StructuredTaskScopeImpl.ST_NEW for state init [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8357797: Use StructuredTaskScopeImpl.ST_NEW for state init [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357797: Use StructuredTaskScopeImpl.ST_NEW for state init [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8357797: Use StructuredTaskScopeImpl.ST_NEW for state init Aleksey Shipilev
• RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard

• Earlier messages
• Later messages