On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:19:57 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadam...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> Andrew Haley has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
>> commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Fix failing serviceability tests
>
> src/jdk.incubator.concurrent/share/classes/jdk/incubator/concurrent/ScopedValue.java
>  line 613:
> 
>> 611:      * @return the value of the scoped value if bound, otherwise {@code 
>> other}
>> 612:      */
>> 613:     public T orElse(T other) {
> 
> From an API perspective, wouldn't return `Optional` a more consistent choice? 
> `Optional` has all methods we need to deal with this kind of stuff...

This comment is on orElse but I suspect you are suggesting that get() be 
changed to return Optional. I think we'll need to get more feedback/usage of 
this API before re-visiting that.

> src/jdk.incubator.concurrent/share/classes/jdk/incubator/concurrent/StructuredTaskScope.java
>  line 229:
> 
>> 227:  *   <li> Inheritance of {@linkplain ScopedValue scoped values} across 
>> threads.
>> 228:  *   <li> Confinement checks. The phrase "threads contained in the task 
>> scope" in method
>> 229:  *   descriptions means threads started in the task scope or descendant 
>> scopes.
> 
> sadly, the term "descendant scopes" is not defined elsewhere in this javadoc

Good poin,t, we had more setup in previous iterations.
@theRealAph I'll adjust this in the loom repo as I can't do it here.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10952

Reply via email to