core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v2] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v4] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v6] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v7] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v8] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v9] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v9] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v9] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v11] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v11] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v12] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v12] Justin Lu
• RFR: 8386833: java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/TestGetTotalGcCpuTime.java#Serial fails with "Some GC CPU time must have been reported" exception Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v3] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v3] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v3] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v4] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v4] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v4] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v5] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v5] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Jorn Vernee
• RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Integrated: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Jatin Bhateja
• Withdrawn: 8381882: Convert test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/unittest/stream tests to JUnit duke
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Laurent Bourgès
• RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false [v2] Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false [v2] Jaikiran Pai
• Withdrawn: 8380841: Add AVX2 optimized intrinsic for binarySearch on primitive arrays duke
• Re: RFR: 8384510: Improve lookup_secondary_supers_table_const on AArch64 [v4] George Wort
• Re: RFR: 8384510: Improve lookup_secondary_supers_table_const on AArch64 [v3] George Wort
• Re: RFR: 8384510: Improve lookup_secondary_supers_table_const on AArch64 [v2] George Wort
• Re: RFR: 8372946 - TreeMap sub-map entry spliterator is expensive [v5] Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8372946 - TreeMap sub-map entry spliterator is expensive [v5] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8372946 - TreeMap sub-map entry spliterator is expensive [v5] Oli Gillespie
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
• Withdrawn: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline duke
• [External] : does self-service mailing list management work yet since the latest mailman upgrade? it's more important than it may seem at first glance Yagnatinsky, Mark
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v101] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v101] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v101] Viktor Klang
• RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Emanuel Peter
• [jdk27] RFR: 8385924: GZIPInputStream.read() behaves differently on some Java versions Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8385924: GZIPInputStream.read() behaves differently on some Java versions Alan Bateman
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8385924: GZIPInputStream.read() behaves differently on some Java versions Jaikiran Pai
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8385924: GZIPInputStream.read() behaves differently on some Java versions Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8381849: Refactor classes in /lib/testlibrary/bootlib to use JUnit instead of TestNG [v5] sstremler
• Re: RFR: 8377819: Security properties jlink plugin [v8] Sean Mullan
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v100] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v100] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v100] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v101] Doug Lea
• [External] : Can CarrierThreadLocal be public API? Roman Kennke
  • Re: [External] : Can CarrierThreadLocal be public API? Alan Bateman
  • [External] : Can CarrierThreadLocal be public API? rkennke
• RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Integrated: 8386848: testBool in java/foreign/normalize/TestNormalize.java fails on Zero VM with expected [true] but found [false] Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v99] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases [v4] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases [v4] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v4] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Locale.Builder.setLocale assumes extensions always exist for special cases [v5] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v7] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v7] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches [v7] Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8387455: Restrict legacy Locale compatibility handling to exact matches Justin Lu
• Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v3] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists [v2] April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists [v2] April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists [v2] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists [v2] April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8386802: ClassFile Util.entryList should consider non-RandomAccess lists [v2] April Ivy

• Earlier messages
• Later messages