core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v4] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v7] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v8] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v9] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v10] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v6] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v12] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v13] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v13] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v13] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v11] fabioromano1
• RFR: 8367157: Remove jrunscript tool Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367157: Remove jrunscript tool Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367157: Remove jrunscript tool Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8367157: Remove jrunscript tool Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8367157: Remove jrunscript tool Erik Joelsson
• Withdrawn: 8357728: Optimize Executable#synthesizeAllParams duke
• RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8367597: Runtime.exit logging failed: Cannot invoke "java.lang.Module.getClassLoader()" because "m" is null Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v58] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v58] Ivan Walulya
• RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v5] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v5] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8365790: Shutdown hook for application image does not work on Windows [v4] Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8365858: FilteredJavaFieldStream is unnecessary Paul Hübner
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v60] Thomas Schatzl
• Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v5] Aleksei Efimov
• Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? David Alayachew
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? David Alayachew
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? David Alayachew
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Pavel Rappo
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Rob Spoor
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Rob Spoor
  • Re: Can we deprecate Path.endsWith(String)? Pavel Rappo
• Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8357708: com.sun.jndi.ldap.Connection ignores queued LDAP replies if Connection is subsequently closed [v4] Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8367382: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367382: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367382: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367382: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367382: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Integrated: 8367382: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367382: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8367382: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology [v2] Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8367237: Thread-Safety Usage Warning for java.text.Collator Classes [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367237: Thread-Safety Usage Warning for java.text.Collator Classes [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367237: Thread-Safety Usage Warning for java.text.Collator Classes [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367237: Thread-Safety Usage Warning for java.text.Collator Classes [v3] Iris Clark
• Re: RFR: 8367237: Thread-Safety Usage Warning for java.text.Collator Classes [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367237: Thread-Safety Usage Warning for java.text.Collator Classes [v2] Iris Clark
• Re: RFR: 8367237: Thread-Safety Usage Warning for java.text.Collator Classes Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367237: Thread-Safety Usage Warning for java.text.Collator Classes [v2] Justin Lu
• RFR: 8367365: java/math/BigInteger/BigIntegerTest.java failed in jtreg timeout Raffaello Giulietti
  • Integrated: 8367365: java/math/BigInteger/BigIntegerTest.java failed in jtreg timeout Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367365: java/math/BigInteger/BigIntegerTest.java failed in jtreg timeout Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367365: java/math/BigInteger/BigIntegerTest.java failed in jtreg timeout Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367365: java/math/BigInteger/BigIntegerTest.java failed in jtreg timeout Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367365: java/math/BigInteger/BigIntegerTest.java failed in jtreg timeout Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367365: java/math/BigInteger/BigIntegerTest.java failed in jtreg timeout Daniel Fuchs
• Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v9] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v9] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v9] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v9] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v9] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v9] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v9] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v9] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v9] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables [v8] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v2] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v2] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v2] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v4] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v4] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v4] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8367387: Add @AOTInitialize annotation [v4] Ashutosh Mehra
• RFR: 8367138: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_macosx.c Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367138: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_macosx.c Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8367138: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_macosx.c Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367138: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_macosx.c Lance Andersen
  • Integrated: 8367138: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_macosx.c Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367138: JNI exception pending in os_getCmdlineAndUserInfo of ProcessHandleImpl_macosx.c Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] Claes Redestad
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] Claes Redestad
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] Claes Redestad
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v2] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v5] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v5] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v6] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v6] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v6] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v7] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v10] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v10] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v10] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v10] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v10] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v10] David Beaumont
  • Integrated: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v8] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v3] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v3] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v3] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8367005: ImageReader refactor caused performance regressions for startup and footprint [v9] David Beaumont
• Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v14] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v14] Roger Riggs
• Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v17] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v17] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v17] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v17] Aleksei Efimov
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v59] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v59] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v59] Fei Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v59] Thomas Schatzl
  • Re: RFR: 8342382: Implement JEP 522: G1 GC: Improve Throughput by Reducing Synchronization [v59] Fei Yang
• Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8346719: Add relaunchers to the static JDK image for missing executables Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8367324: Avoid redundant parsing when formatting with DigitList Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8367324: Avoid redundant parsing when formatting with DigitList Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8367324: Avoid redundant parsing when formatting with DigitList Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367324: Avoid redundant parsing when formatting with DigitList Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8367324: Avoid redundant parsing when formatting with DigitList [v2] Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8367324: Avoid redundant parsing when formatting with DigitList [v2] Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8367324: Avoid redundant parsing when formatting with DigitList Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8367324: Avoid redundant parsing when formatting with DigitList [v2] Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8367324: Avoid redundant parsing when formatting with DigitList [v2] Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8367324: Avoid redundant parsing when formatting with DigitList [v2] Justin Lu

• Earlier messages
• Later messages