On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:43:42 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadam...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Jim Laskey has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Wrong line separator > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/template/StringTemplate.java line 302: > >> 300: >> 301: /** >> 302: * No-op template processor. Used to highlight that non-processing >> of the StringTemplate > > I wonder if there's a play to call this the "identity" processor. In the > sense that it takes a template and just returns that unchanged. That would > also help with calling it "raw" which creates confusion with some compiler > messages. It's a reasonable suggestion. This processor would used rarely, so calling it IDENTITY (more than 3 characters) is not an impediment. However, IDENTITY doesn't really speak to what it does. RAW was chosen primarily because it is what other languages use. (I had used NOOP earlier.) ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10889
