On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 20:15:55 GMT, Marcono1234 <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> review suggestion - simplify test
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Collections.java line 1718:
>
>> 1716: public void forEachRemaining(Consumer<? super
>> Map.Entry<K, V>> action) {
>> 1717: Objects.requireNonNull(action);
>> 1718: i.forEachRemaining(entryConsumer(action));
>
> As pointed out in the bug report description, it might be better to add the
> `null` check to `entryConsumer`. That would avoid code duplication for the
> `null` checks for all the current callers of `entryConsumer`.
>
> (This comment only applies here; for `CheckedEntrySet` below this does not
> work because it does not call `entryConsumer`.)
Hello @Marcono1234, I prefer doing it earliest in the top level method (which
specifies the contract) instead of doing it in an internal method that this
method calls.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11154
