On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 10:16:22 GMT, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Alan Bateman has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Expand test
>> - Adjust wording to make it clear that the number of tasks is non-negative
>> - Merge
>> - Improve javadoc
>> - Merge
>> - Initial commit
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 2920:
>
>> 2918: * @since 20
>> 2919: */
>> 2920: public <T> ForkJoinTask<T> externalSubmit(ForkJoinTask<T> task) {
>
> @AlanBateman Does it make sense to check the nullness of the `task` before
> going into the storeStoreFence etc?
It's only to be the same as poolSubmit.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11319
