On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 03:09:53 GMT, Tingjun Yuan <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> Why not use set of classes? >> >> Because some classes are not visible here (such as `Arrays.ArrayList`). >> >> I'm not sure what the best choice is, so I'm trying to explore the >> implementation plan. > >> > Why not use set of classes? >> >> Because some classes are not visible here (such as `Arrays.ArrayList`). >> >> I'm not sure what the best choice is, so I'm trying to explore the >> implementation plan. > > Only `Arrays.ArrayList` is not visible here. You can change it into > package-private. > > > Why not use set of classes? > > > > > > Because some classes are not visible here (such as `Arrays.ArrayList`). > > I'm not sure what the best choice is, so I'm trying to explore the > > implementation plan. > > Only `Arrays.ArrayList` is not visible here. You can change it to > package-private. Another problem is that use set of classes may cause unnecessary classes to be loaded, which has a negative impact on startup speed. I want to do some tests in the next few days. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12212
