On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:16:45 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos <[email protected]> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/CharacterDataLatin1.java.template line
>> 170:
>>
>>> 168: * @return true if the two bytes are considered equals ignoring
>>> case in latin1
>>> 169: */
>>> 170: static boolean equalsIgnoreCase(byte b1, byte b2) {
>>
>> Perhaps put this in `CharacterDataLatin1`, keeping it close to
>> toLowerCase/toUpperCase that you're changing to use similar logic with
>> #12623
>>
>> If you apply #12623 first - how much difference does this make on the micro
>> you're adding with this PR?
>
> Is it not already in CharacterDataLatin1?
>
> Here is a comparison of relying on improvements in
> `CharacterDataLatin1.toUpperCase/toLowerCase` only vs. using
> `CharacterDataLatin1.equalsIgnoreCase`:
>
> Character.toUpperCase/toLowerCase only:
>
>
> Benchmark (codePoints) (size) Mode Cnt
> Score Error Units
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC ascii-match 1024 avgt 15
> 1310.582 ± 84.777 ns/op
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC ascii-mismatch 1024 avgt 15
> 4.547 ± 0.545 ns/op
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC number-match 1024 avgt 15
> 686.947 ± 11.850 ns/op
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC number-mismatch 1024 avgt 15
> 3.836 ± 0.634 ns/op
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC lat1-match 1024 avgt 15
> 2107.219 ± 17.662 ns/op
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC lat1-mismatch 1024 avgt 15
> 4.924 ± 0.829 ns/op
>
>
> CharacterDataLatin1.equalsIgnoreCase:
>
>
> Benchmark (codePoints) (size) Mode Cnt
> Score Error Units
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC ascii-match 1024 avgt 15
> 742.467 ± 34.490 ns/op
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC ascii-mismatch 1024 avgt 15
> 3.960 ± 0.046 ns/op
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC number-match 1024 avgt 15
> 361.158 ± 37.096 ns/op
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC number-mismatch 1024 avgt 15
> 4.039 ± 0.521 ns/op
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC lat1-match 1024 avgt 15
> 1158.091 ± 41.617 ns/op
> RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC lat1-mismatch 1024 avgt 15
> 4.358 ± 0.123 ns/op
Oops, I lost context and thought this was in `StringLatin1`.
Thanks for running the numbers with #12623. Looks like you're getting big
enough of an improvement on top.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12632
