core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v104] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Justin Lu
• RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8387949: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects Anthony Scarpino
• RFR: 8377819: Security properties jlink plugin (alternate implementation) Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8377819: Security properties jlink plugin (alternate implementation) Sean Mullan
• RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Arno Zeller
• RFR: 8382938: jar tool will create multi-release jars where different versions are incompatible Christian Stein
• Re: [External] : Speeding up InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() Markus KARG
• Re: RFR: 8364025: MinMaxVector clipping range benchmark highestInt/Long can overflow [v2] Galder Zamarreño
• Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v22] Eric Fang
• RFR: 8382841: Remove AnnotationSupport.memberValues backdoor April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Remove AnnotationSupport.memberValues backdoor April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Remove AnnotationSupport.memberValues backdoor Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Remove AnnotationSupport.memberValues backdoor Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v2] April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v2] April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v3] April Ivy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8382841: Revert annotation parsing changes from libgraal April Ivy
• RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants Alex Buckley
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8387977: The java manpage should describe the new main method variants [v2] David Holmes
• RFR: JDK-8387985: sun/tools/jstat tests fail on platforms without Parallel GC Elif Aslan
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC sendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC Elif Aslan
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC [v2] Elif Aslan
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC [v3] Elif Aslan
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8387985: sun/tools/jstat shell tests fail on platforms that do not support ParallelGC Elif Aslan
• Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Maurizio Cimadamore
• Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] David Simms
• RFR: 8387795: Remove hard coded set of locales in LocaleData Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387795: Remove hard coded set of locales in LocaleData [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387795: Remove hard coded set of locales in LocaleData [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8387795: Remove hard coded set of locales in LocaleData [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8387795: Remove hard coded set of locales in LocaleData Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v16] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v16] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v16] Valerie Peng
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v103] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v2] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v4] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v5] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v6] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v7] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v8] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v9] Sholto
• RFR: 8386833: java/lang/management/MemoryMXBean/TestGetTotalGcCpuTime.java#Serial fails with "Some GC CPU time must have been reported" exception Kevin Walls
• RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v2] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v3] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v3] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v3] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v4] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v4] Vladimir Ivanov
• RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Integrated: 8386322: Float16Vector.toString should render lane values using Float16.toString Jatin Bhateja
• Withdrawn: 8381882: Convert test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/unittest/stream tests to JUnit duke
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v10] Laurent Bourgès
• RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false Volker Simonis
  • Re: RFR: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false [v2] Volker Simonis
• Withdrawn: 8380841: Add AVX2 optimized intrinsic for binarySearch on primitive arrays duke
• Re: RFR: 8384510: Improve lookup_secondary_supers_table_const on AArch64 [v4] George Wort
• Re: RFR: 8384510: Improve lookup_secondary_supers_table_const on AArch64 [v3] George Wort
• Re: RFR: 8384510: Improve lookup_secondary_supers_table_const on AArch64 [v2] George Wort
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v102] Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Christian Hagedorn
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v8] Dean Long
• Withdrawn: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline duke
• [External] : does self-service mailing list management work yet since the latest mailman upgrade? it's more important than it may seem at first glance Yagnatinsky, Mark
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v101] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v101] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v101] Viktor Klang
• RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Jatin Bhateja
• [jdk27] RFR: 8385924: GZIPInputStream.read() behaves differently on some Java versions Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8385924: GZIPInputStream.read() behaves differently on some Java versions Alan Bateman
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8385924: GZIPInputStream.read() behaves differently on some Java versions Jaikiran Pai
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8385924: GZIPInputStream.read() behaves differently on some Java versions Jaikiran Pai

• Earlier messages