On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 17:23:38 GMT, Stuart Marks <sma...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> PR for Sequenced Collections implementation.
Please include the following fix for the langtools test "failures":
diff --git a/test/langtools/tools/javac/api/TestJavacTaskScanner.java
b/test/langtools/tools/javac/api/TestJavacTaskScanner.java
index e8110396dac..8d53c3b9d6f 100644
--- a/test/langtools/tools/javac/api/TestJavacTaskScanner.java
+++ b/test/langtools/tools/javac/api/TestJavacTaskScanner.java
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ public class TestJavacTaskScanner extends ToolTester {
System.out.println("#allMembers: " + numAllMembers);
check(numTokens, "#Tokens", 1054);
- check(numParseTypeElements, "#parseTypeElements", 158);
+ check(numParseTypeElements, "#parseTypeElements", 170);
check(numAllMembers, "#allMembers", 52);
}
diff --git a/test/langtools/tools/javac/processing/model/type/BoundsTest.java
b/test/langtools/tools/javac/processing/model/type/BoundsTest.java
index b7e9121a956..c47b7a7de92 100644
--- a/test/langtools/tools/javac/processing/model/type/BoundsTest.java
+++ b/test/langtools/tools/javac/processing/model/type/BoundsTest.java
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ public class BoundsTest {
};
private static final String[] Single_supers = {
"java.lang.Object",
- "java.util.Collection"
+ "java.util.SequencedCollection"
};
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/7387#issuecomment-1306689463
