On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:51:22 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> CorruptedZipFiles could benefit from some spring cleaning and a conversion >> to junit: >> >> - The actual tests are moved into their own `@Test` methods, given more >> meaningful names and a Javadoc comment explaining the constraint being >> verified >> - The setup code is moved to a `@Before` method, slightly modernized and >> rewritten to take advantage of `assertEquals` >> - `checkZipExceptionImpl` is updated to take advantage of `assertThrows` >> - A bunch of constants copied over from `ZipFile` can be deleted since >> JDK-6225935 has long been fixed > > Eirik Bjorsnos has updated the pull request incrementally with four > additional commits since the last revision: > > - Document the structure of the 'good' ZIP > - Use the "Validate that.." comment style > - Document the ByteBuffer with a comment > - Use ByteBuffer when manipulating multi-byte fields @Martin-Buchholz this PR suggests we can improve the `CorruptedZipFiles` test. Would be interested in hearing if you agree this is an improvement? If not, why? Thanks! ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12563#issuecomment-1491967200
