On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 03:25:53 GMT, Amit Kumar <amitku...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> DeInflate.java test fails on s390x platform because size for out1 array
>> which is responsible for storing the compressed data is insufficient. And
>> being unable to write whole compressed data on array, on s390 whole data
>> can't be recovered after compression. This PR updates the check method in
>> the DeInflate test to no longer rely on pre-defined lengths/sizes to
>> determine whether deflate followed by an inflate of data worked correctly.
>> These sizes can vary depending on the underlying zlib implementations. The
>> updated check method now uses a `ByteArrayOutputStream` to deflate into and
>> then inflate from.
>>
>> Thanks to @jaikiran for amazing PR description.
>
> Amit Kumar has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> comments from Lance
test/jdk/java/util/zip/DeInflate.java line 124:
> 122: * This method checks if a given Deflater and Inflater pair can
> correctly compress and decompress data.
> 123: * checks were performed for this functionality using various input
> scenarios and ByteBuffer instances.
> 124: */
Would you consider updating this comment to something like:
/**
* Uses the {@code def} deflater to deflate the input data {@code in} of length
{@code len}.
* A new {@link Inflater} is then created within this method to inflate the
deflated data. The
* inflated data is then compared with the {@code in} to assert that it matches
the original
* input data.
* This method repeats these checks for the different overloaded methods of
* {@code Deflater.deflate(...)} and {@code Inflater.inflate(...)}
*
* @param def the deflater to use for deflating the contents in {@code in}
* @param in the input content
* @param len the length of the input content to use
* @param nowrap will be passed to the constructor of the {@code Inflater} used
in this
* method
* @throws Throwable if any error occurs during the check
*/
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12283#discussion_r1178690586
