For FFI, I would prefer some parts of the FFI, especially generic ones
like Indirect Var Handles, to be promoted from the preview status.
They are useful for non-FFI purposes.
Has FFI API considered promoting APIs out of preview incrementally,
like how Virtual Threads and Scoped values are?

Chen Liang


On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 12:28 PM Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Uwe Schindler" <uschind...@apache.org>
> > To: "core-libs-dev" <core-libs-dev@openjdk.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 5:38:32 PM
> > Subject: JEP 442: Foreign Function & Memory API => why is it again preview 
> > API?
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Uwe,
>
> >
> > yesterday Apache Lucene got the information that JDK 21 got the project
> > panama JEP 442 update and I implemented it already in our source tree.
> >
> > Unfortunately the API is again marked "preview", but JDK 21 is "LTS
> > release". Many of our users (Elasticserach, Solr) will be switching to
> > this version. We were really hoping that the java.lang.foreign API is
> > finished at that time. I checked the changes in our code: just a rename
> > of a method and FileChannel#map now takes Arena instead of Scope.
>
> I see that Alan and Maurizio have already answer to your other points.
>
> Having preview features and being a LTS are to separate concerns.
> Being a LTS is about support, having preview features is about having 
> feedback before finalizing an API.
>
> Java 17 was released with preview features, Java 21 will be.
>
> Before Java 10, when we were doing feature release model, if a feature was 
> not ready yet, either the release was delayed (Java 9 was delayed 3 times if 
> i'm remembering correctly) or postponed to the next big release (Java Module 
> was initially scheduled for Java 8). With the new cadence model, features 
> that are not ready yet are marked as preview.
>
> I understand that you are eager to use MemorySegment in anger but since a 
> looong time, Java features are only released when they are ready :)
>
> Also, it seems that we will have a LTS release every two years now, if a LTS 
> had no preview, it means that we will not get any feedback for 1/4 of the 
> releases.
>
> >
> > Uwe
> >
>
> regards,
> Rémi
>
> >
> > --
> > Uwe Schindler
> > uschind...@apache.org
> > ASF Member, Member of PMC and Committer of Apache Lucene and Apache Solr
> > Bremen, Germany
> > https://lucene.apache.org/
> > https://solr.apache.org/

Reply via email to