On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:13:24 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Correct misstatement that the Class object for a primitive type can only be
>> be access via fields like java.lang.Integer.TYPE.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java line 818:
>
>> 816: * they represent, namely {@code boolean}, {@code byte},
>> 817: * {@code char}, {@code short}, {@code int},
>> 818: * {@code long}, {@code float}, and {@code double}.
>
> Should we add `{@code void}` to the list here, as this is one of the
> primitive type names?
@liach please have a look at this intensive exchange between David Holmes
(@dholmes-ora) and me:
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/6213#issuecomment-960420076 That exchange
relates to other keywords that might appear in plain (i.e. prose) font.
Speaking of which, I might still owe David a follow-up PR.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14574#discussion_r1238697667
