On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 14:14:54 GMT, Lance Andersen <lan...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> I think as we compare performance, we also should strive for consistency 
> between Zip and ZipFS implementation as well

Can we move `ZipUtils`, `ZipCoder`, and `ZipConstants` to other package (such 
as `jdk.internal.zip`)? Then we can share them between `java.util.zip` and 
zipfs.

If there's no reason to stop us from doing this, I can open a new PR to do this 
after this PR is merged.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14632#issuecomment-1607592460

Reply via email to