On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:05:11 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov <stsypa...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Double-checked locking should rely on local variable to avoid racy reads from 
> volatile field.

True. I was mislead because the return statement does not appear in the 
changeset (the line is textually the same, although it has a different 
semantics: `keySet` now refers to a local), so I didn't count for it.

In the end, this PR is not about fixing a race, as the title seems to suggest 
(the original code is correct), but to avoid a volatile read, right?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14692#issuecomment-1614317093

Reply via email to