On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 18:01:45 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Thread::getState is an API for monitoring and management purposes to report 
> the thread state. If a virtual thread is parked with LockSupport.parkNanos, 
> its state is reported as  WAITING when it should be TIMED_WAITING. JVM TI 
> GetThreadState has the same issue in that it returns 
> JVMTI_THREAD_STATE_WAITING_INDEFINITELY instead of the 
> JVMTI_THREAD_STATE_WAITING_WITH_TIMEOUT bit set. Not a very visible issue 
> because JDWP maps both states to "WAIT" but it may be noticed by tools using 
> other JVM TI agents.
> 
> The change is straight-forward, it's just additional state bit to indicate 
> that park is timed. The existing virtual/ThreadAPI.java test is expanded to 
> this scenario. A new test is added for JVM TI GetThreadState to test 
> waiting/timed-waited cases (including pinned) as test coverage seems patchy 
> here.

src/hotspot/share/classfile/javaClasses.hpp line 536:

> 534: 
> 535:     // additional state bits
> 536:     TIMED        = 1 << 8,   // timed parked

Why handle TIMED this way instead of just making TIMED_PARKED/PARKING states?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14978#discussion_r1273010956

Reply via email to