core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v5] Andrew Dinn
• RFR: 8384631: SwitchBoostraps.typeSwitch method Javadoc still mentions target of a reference type Dusan Balek
  • Re: RFR: 8384631: SwitchBoostraps.typeSwitch method Javadoc still mentions target of a reference type Dusan Balek
  • Re: RFR: 8384631: SwitchBoostraps.typeSwitch method Javadoc still mentions target of a reference type Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8384631: SwitchBoostraps.typeSwitch method Javadoc still mentions target of a reference type Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8384631: SwitchBoostraps.typeSwitch method Javadoc still mentions target of a reference type duke
  • Integrated: 8384631: SwitchBoostraps.typeSwitch method Javadoc still mentions target of a reference type Dusan Balek
• RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v2] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v4] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v6] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] jonghoonpark
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v7] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature [v8] Manuel Hässig
  • Integrated: 8382582: Remove the experimental JVMCI feature Manuel Hässig
• Re: RFR: 8348828: Windows dll loading now resolves symlinks [v12] Benjamin Peterson
• Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v2] Ashay Rane
• Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v3] Ashay Rane
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v3] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8384371: CngCipher and DupAlias tests fail on Windows [v3] Ashay Rane
• Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Ferenc Rakoczi
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Andrew Dinn
  • Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v4] Andrew Dinn
• Withdrawn: 8379786: Fix integer overflow in String.encodedLengthUTF8 LATIN1 path duke
• Re: RFR: 8360700: Implement JEP 534: Compact Object Headers by Default [v6] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8360700: Implement JEP 534: Compact Object Headers by Default [v6] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8360700: Implement JEP 534: Compact Object Headers by Default [v6] Coleen Phillimore
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v13] Archie Cobbs
• Re: RFR: 8355216: Accelerate P-256 arithmetic on aarch64 [v3] Ferenc Rakoczi
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v76] Doug Lea
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v75] Doug Lea
• Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8371949: Upcall exception handler crashes with bad oop Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8371949: Upcall exception handler crashes with bad oop David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371949: Upcall exception handler crashes with bad oop Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8371949: Upcall exception handler crashes with bad oop David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371949: Upcall exception handler crashes with bad oop Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8371949: Upcall exception handler crashes with bad oop Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8371949: Upcall exception handler crashes with bad oop Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8371949: Upcall exception handler crashes with bad oop David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8371949: Upcall exception handler crashes with bad oop Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8371949: Upcall exception handler crashes with bad oop Aleksey Shipilev
• Re: [External] : Is libsyslookup.so needed for FFM on Linux? Maurizio Cimadamore
• RFR: 8384505: Account for all jtreg-based frames in stack walk test Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8384505: Account for all jtreg-based frames in stack walk test Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384505: Account for all jtreg-based frames in stack walk test [v2] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8384505: Account for all jtreg-based frames in stack walk test [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384505: Account for all jtreg-based frames in stack walk test [v2] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8384505: Account for all jtreg-based frames in stack walk test [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8384505: Account for all jtreg-based frames in stack walk test [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8384505: Account for all jtreg-based frames in stack walk test [v2] Christian Stein
  • Integrated: 8384505: Account for all jtreg-based frames in stack walk test Christian Stein
• Withdrawn: 8372460: Use EnumMap instead of HashMap for DateTimeFormatter parsing to improve performance duke
• Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v8] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v8] Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v8] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v8] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v8] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v8] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v8] Viktor Klang
• RFR: 8371842: Update CLDR to Version 48.2 Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8371842: Update CLDR to Version 48.2 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8371842: Update CLDR to Version 48.2 [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8371842: Update CLDR to Version 48.2 [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8371842: Update CLDR to Version 48.2 [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8371842: Update CLDR to Version 48.2 [v4] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8371842: Update CLDR to Version 48.2 [v4] Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8371842: Update CLDR to Version 48.2 [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8371842: Update CLDR to Version 48.2 Naoto Sato
• Integrated: 8381644: Locale matching APIs should describe `null` element behavior Justin Lu
• Integrated: 8358521: Optimize vector operations by reassociating broadcasted inputs Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v74] Doug Lea
• Integrated: 8380794: AttributedString performance Daniel Gredler
• Re: RFR: 8381882: Convert test/jaxp/javax/xml/jaxp/unittest/stream tests to JUnit [v2] Marcono1234
• Re: RFR: 8380391: Update java.smartcardio finalizer to use Cleaner [v7] Brent Christian
• RFR: 8378583: (process) ProcessBuilder tests that span deeper trees must pass launchMechanism to their children Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378583: (process) ProcessBuilder tests that span deeper trees must pass launchMechanism to their children [v2] Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378583: (process) ProcessBuilder tests that span deeper trees must pass launchMechanism to their children [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8378583: (process) ProcessBuilder tests that span deeper trees must pass launchMechanism to their children [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8378583: (process) ProcessBuilder tests that span deeper trees must pass launchMechanism to their children [v2] Frederic Thevenet
  • Re: RFR: 8378583: (process) ProcessBuilder tests that span deeper trees must pass launchMechanism to their children [v2] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8378583: (process) ProcessBuilder tests that span deeper trees must pass launchMechanism to their children [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8378583: (process) ProcessBuilder tests that span deeper trees must pass launchMechanism to their children Frederic Thevenet
• Re: RFR: 8380794: AttributedString performance [v3] Daniel Gredler
  • Re: RFR: 8380794: AttributedString performance [v3] Justin Lu
• RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Update jimage format to support classes compiled with preview feature enabled Coleen Phillimore

• Earlier messages
• Later messages