core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8370839: Tests to verify peculiar Proxy dispatching behaviors [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8370839: Tests to verify peculiar Proxy dispatching behaviors [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8370839: Tests to verify peculiar Proxy dispatching behaviors [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8370839: Tests to verify peculiar Proxy dispatching behaviors [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8370839: Tests to verify peculiar Proxy dispatching behaviors [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8370839: Tests to verify peculiar Proxy dispatching behaviors [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8370839: Tests to verify peculiar Proxy dispatching behaviors [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8370839: Tests to verify peculiar Proxy dispatching behaviors [v5] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8370839: Tests to verify peculiar Proxy dispatching behaviors Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v22] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v22] Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8370393: Cleanup handling of ancient Windows versions from GetJavaProperties java_props_md Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8370393: Cleanup handling of ancient Windows versions from GetJavaProperties java_props_md Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8370393: Cleanup handling of ancient Windows versions from GetJavaProperties java_props_md David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8370393: Cleanup handling of ancient Windows versions from GetJavaProperties java_props_md Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8370393: Cleanup handling of ancient Windows versions from GetJavaProperties java_props_md Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8370393: Cleanup handling of ancient Windows versions from GetJavaProperties java_props_md Roger Riggs
  • Integrated: 8370393: Cleanup handling of ancient Windows versions from GetJavaProperties java_props_md Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8370393: Cleanup handling of ancient Windows versions from GetJavaProperties java_props_md Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8366017: Extend the set of inputs handled by fast paths in FloatingDecimal [v6] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366017: Extend the set of inputs handled by fast paths in FloatingDecimal [v6] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8366017: Extend the set of inputs handled by fast paths in FloatingDecimal [v6] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8366017: Extend the set of inputs handled by fast paths in FloatingDecimal [v6] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8366017: Extend the set of inputs handled by fast paths in FloatingDecimal [v6] Raffaello Giulietti
• RFR: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and releated obsolete code Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and releated obsolete code Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and releated obsolete code Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and releated obsolete code Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and releated obsolete code Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and releated obsolete code [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and releated obsolete code [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and releated obsolete code [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and related obsolete code [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and related obsolete code [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 6400876: (bf) Remove sun.nio.ByteBuffered and related obsolete code Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8370775: ModulePatcher$JarResourceFinder.getByteBuffer() does not close the InputStream after reading the bytes Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8370775: ModulePatcher$JarResourceFinder.getByteBuffer() does not close the InputStream after reading the bytes Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370775: ModulePatcher$JarResourceFinder.getByteBuffer() does not close the InputStream after reading the bytes [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8370775: ModulePatcher$JarResourceFinder.getByteBuffer() does not close the InputStream after reading the bytes [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8370775: ModulePatcher$JarResourceFinder.getByteBuffer() does not close the InputStream after reading the bytes [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370775: ModulePatcher$JarResourceFinder.getByteBuffer() does not close the InputStream after reading the bytes [v2] Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8370775: ModulePatcher$JarResourceFinder.getByteBuffer() does not close the InputStream after reading the bytes [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8370775: ModulePatcher$JarResourceFinder.getByteBuffer() does not close the InputStream after reading the bytes Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8363925: Remove unused sun.nio.cs.ArrayEncoder::encode [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8363925: Remove unused sun.nio.cs.ArrayEncoder::encode [v2] Volkan Yazici
• Re: RFR: 8363925: Remove unused sun.nio.cs.ArrayEncoder::encode [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8363925: Remove unused sun.nio.cs.ArrayEncoder::encode [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8363925: Remove unused sun.nio.cs.ArrayEncoder::encode [v4] Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8366575: Remove SDP support Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8366575: Remove SDP support Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8368199: Add @AOTSafeClassInitializer to jdk.internal.access.SharedSecrets [v3] Ioi Lam
• Re: RFR: 8368199: Add @AOTSafeClassInitializer to jdk.internal.access.SharedSecrets [v2] Ioi Lam
• Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v8] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8355342: File.getCanonicalPath on Java 24 resolves paths on network drives to UNC format [v8] Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8368172: Make java.time.format.DateTimePrintContext immutable [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8368172: Make java.time.format.DateTimePrintContext immutable [v6] Chen Liang
• JDBC DriverManager never updated for system classloader? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: JDBC DriverManager never updated for system classloader? Alan Bateman
  • Re: JDBC DriverManager never updated for system classloader? Charles Oliver Nutter
• Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v9] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v9] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v9] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v9] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v9] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v9] Fei Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v9] Patricio Chilano Mateo
• Re: RFR: 8369238: Allow virtual thread preemption on some common class initialization paths [v8] Patricio Chilano Mateo
• Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v24] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v24] Jason Mehrens
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v24] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v24] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v24] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v24] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v24] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v24] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v24] Pavel Rappo
• Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v23] Roger Riggs
• RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently [v2] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently [v3] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently [v3] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently [v4] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8370568: Refer to Thread.interrupted as "interrupted status" consistently Pavel Rappo
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v25] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v25] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v25] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v25] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v25] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v25] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v25] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v25] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v25] Raffaello Giulietti
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v24] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v23] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v22] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v21] fabioromano1
• Integrated: 8368500: ContextClassLoader cannot be reset on threads in ForkJoinPool.commonPool() Johny Jose
• Re: RFR: 8365675: Add String Unicode Case-Folding Support [v5] Xueming Shen
• InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Florian Weimer
  • Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Pavel Rappo
  • Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Alan Bateman
  • Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Pavel Rappo
  • Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Viktor Klang
  • Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Florian Weimer
  • Re: [External] : Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Viktor Klang
  • Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Pavel Rappo
  • Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Archie Cobbs
  • Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Florian Weimer
  • Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Archie Cobbs
  • Re: InputStream/OutputStream concurrency guarantees Florian Weimer
• Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v22] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v22] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v22] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v22] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v22] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v22] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v22] Roger Riggs
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v20] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v20] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v20] Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v19] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v18] fabioromano1
• JDK-8200559: Offer a means for Java agents to define auxiliary classes Rafael Winterhalter
• Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? David Alayachew
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? David Alayachew
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? Andrew Dinn
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? David Alayachew
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? Pavel Rappo
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? Pavel Rappo
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? David Alayachew
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? Pavel Rappo
  • Re: Could we add \a as an escape sequence for bell? David Alayachew
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v17] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v16] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v15] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v14] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v13] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v12] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v11] fabioromano1
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v10] fabioromano1
• Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off wenshao
  • Re: Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Alan Bateman
  • 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off wenshao
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Alan Bateman
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Stuart Marks
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Stuart Marks
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Alan Bateman
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Stuart Marks
  • Re: 回复：Propose to remove support for CompactStrings off Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8368695: Support 101 switching protocol in jdk.httpserver [v13] Josiah Noel
• Withdrawn: 8368695: Support 101 switching protocol in jdk.httpserver Josiah Noel
• Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v21] Roger Riggs
• Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v20] Roger Riggs
• RFR: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Iris Clark
  • Integrated: 8370633: Remove dead code for Windows file path canonicalization functions Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v19] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v19] Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8370628: Rename BigInteger::nthRoot to rootn, and similarly for nthRootAndRemainder Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8370628: Rename BigInteger::nthRoot to rootn, and similarly for nthRootAndRemainder Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8370628: Rename BigInteger::nthRoot to rootn, and similarly for nthRootAndRemainder [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8370628: Rename BigInteger::nthRoot to rootn, and similarly for nthRootAndRemainder [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: 8370628: Rename BigInteger::nthRoot to rootn, and similarly for nthRootAndRemainder Raffaello Giulietti
• RFR: 8370514: Problemlist nio/channels/AsyncCloseAndInterrupt until JDK-8368290 is resolved Mikhailo Seledtsov
  • Re: RFR: 8370514: Problemlist nio/channels/AsyncCloseAndInterrupt until JDK-8368290 is resolved Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8370514: Problemlist nio/channels/AsyncCloseAndInterrupt until JDK-8368290 is resolved Mikhailo Seledtsov
  • Integrated: 8370514: Problemlist nio/channels/AsyncCloseAndInterrupt until JDK-8368290 is resolved Mikhailo Seledtsov
• Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v22] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v22] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v22] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v24] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v24] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v24] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v24] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v25] Raffaello Giulietti
• Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v6] Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8368178: Add specialization of SequencedCollection methods to standard list factories [v3] Tagir F . Valeev
  • Re: RFR: 8368178: Add specialization of SequencedCollection methods to standard list factories [v3] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8368178: Add specialization of SequencedCollection methods to standard list factories [v3] Tagir F . Valeev
• Re: RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v5] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots [v9] Joe Darcy

• Earlier messages
• Later messages