On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 06:17:13 GMT, Vyom Tewari <vtew...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> If i am reading code correctly then with the new implementation, until client > issue the next "FIS.read" he may or may not know if there was exception > pending in previous 'read' call ?. > I am not sure in case of partial read we have suppress the exception. It's a forced move because bytes have already been copied into user's byte[]. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14981#discussion_r1274438315
