On Sat, 19 Aug 2023 02:15:06 GMT, Weibing Xiao <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Please refer to JDK-8314063.
>>
>> The failure scenario is due to the setting of connection timeout. It is
>> either too small or not an optimal value for the system. When the client
>> tries to connect to the server with LDAPs protocol. It requires the
>> handshake after the socket is created and connected, but it fails due to
>> connection timeout and leaves the socket open. It is not closed properly due
>> to the exception handling in the JDK code.
>>
>> The change is adding a try/catch block and closing the socket in the catch
>> block, and the format of the code got changed consequently.
>
> Weibing Xiao has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> refactor the code and test cases
test/jdk/com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapSSLHandshakeFailureTest.java line 77:
> 75: // start the test server first.
> 76: boolean serverSlowDown = false;
> 77: if(args.length ==2 ) {
Suggestion:
if (args.length ==2 ) {
test/jdk/com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapSSLHandshakeFailureTest.java line 80:
> 78: serverSlowDown = Boolean.valueOf(args[1]);
> 79: } else {
> 80: if(args.length ==1 ) {
Suggestion:
if (args.length ==1) {
test/jdk/com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapSSLHandshakeFailureTest.java line 98:
> 96: }
> 97: env.put("java.naming.ldap.version", "3");
> 98: if (args.length == 2 ) {
Suggestion:
if (args.length == 2) {
test/jdk/com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapSSLHandshakeFailureTest.java line 99:
> 97: env.put("java.naming.ldap.version", "3");
> 98: if (args.length == 2 ) {
> 99: if( args[0].contains("LdapSSLHandshakeFailureTest")) {
Suggestion:
if (args[0].contains("LdapSSLHandshakeFailureTest")) {
test/jdk/com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapSSLHandshakeFailureTest.java line 122:
> 120: }
> 121: } finally {
> 122: if(ctx != null)
Suggestion:
if (ctx != null)
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15294#discussion_r1299160346
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15294#discussion_r1299160377
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15294#discussion_r1299160495
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15294#discussion_r1299160402
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15294#discussion_r1299160439