On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:45:31 GMT, Claes Redestad <redes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I think this overall looks reasonable, but I think a more thorough proof /
> test would help to build confidence that all these changes are semantically
> neutral.
>
> The `isLowerCaseEx` needs to explain why two lower-case codepoints are
> omitted (perhaps this should be `hasUpperCase`?)
String str1 = new String(new byte[]{(byte) 0xb5}, StandardCharsets.ISO_8859_1);
String str2 = new String(new byte[]{(byte) 0xdf}, StandardCharsets.ISO_8859_1);
System.out.println(str1 + "\t" + str1.toUpperCase());
System.out.println(str2 + "\t" + str2.toUpperCase());
result :
µ Μ
ß SS
0xb5 and 0xdf call toUpperCaseEx return and input are different, these two
codepoints are to ensure that the behavior has not changed.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14751#issuecomment-1703265488
