On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 23:34:01 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hi,
>> 
>> Could I have a review of an enhancement that replaces the use of ASM with 
>> the new Class-File API. This change only deals with bytecode that writes 
>> event data into buffers. Bytecode transformations carried out by classes in 
>> jdk.jfr.internal.intrument package are kept as is. Plan is to try to replace 
>> those with events in java.base.
>> 
>> To simplify the review process, I have tried to keep the code in the classes 
>> EventInstrumentation and EventClassBuilder similar to what existed before. 
>> Further refactorizations may happen at a later stage. 
>> 
>> Testing: tier1-3 + jdk/jdk/jfr
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Erik
>
> src/jdk.jfr/share/classes/jdk/jfr/internal/EventClassBuilder.java line 73:
> 
>> 71:         byte[] bytes = Classfile.of().build(ClassDesc.of(fullClassName), 
>> cb -> build(cb));
>> 72:         try {
>> 73:             String name = "/Users/egahlin/DynamicEvent" + 
>> (idCounter.longValue() - 1);
> 
> You probably wish to use `Bytecode.log` instead.

Yes, looks like I missed some changes. Thanks.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16195#discussion_r1359996178

Reply via email to