Hi Dalibor, Thank you for your suggestions. I have realized my mistake. I will discuss this further in JCK group and look for a conclusion.
Apologies for posting this topic here and wasting your time. Please consider this thread as closed. Regards, Ramdas ________________________________ From: core-libs-dev <[email protected]> on behalf of Dalibor Topic <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2023 3:05 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Request for JCK17 tests exclusion Hi Ramdas, On a side note, please do not forward or copy e-mails from the conformance-octla-private mailing list to other OpenJDK mailing lists, since they may contain confidential information. Instead, please start a fresh thread in the future describing the specific concerns with specific functionality in the OpenJDK source code. cheers, dalibor topic On 18.10.2023 19:47, Nandagiri, Ramadasu (NSDi) wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Thanks for your response and the suggestion. I have copied, net-dev on > my original mail. I will wait for a response from net-dev group. > > Regards, > Ramdas > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Alan Bateman <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 18, 2023 8:51 PM > *To:* Nandagiri, Ramadasu (NSDi) <[email protected]>; > [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] > <[email protected]> > *Cc:* Bhat, Suma Mudakare Bheema (NSDi) <[email protected]>; Gragg, > Jeffrey <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: Request for JCK17 tests exclusion > On 18/10/2023 15:55, Nandagiri, Ramadasu (NSDi) wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please see the discussion in the following mails. One of the TCK test >> cases, api/java_net/MulticastSocket/ClassLevel.html is failing on >> NonStop platform as NonStop doesn't support IP_MULTICAST_ALL option. >> >> We would like this test case to be excluded from TCK. Please share >> your thoughts on this request. > > I realize you have been directed here but this is not the right place to > discuss TCK exclusion requests. > > From the mails you forwarded then it looks like there are issues with > the multicast support in your port to NonStop. The IP_MULTICAST_ALL > socket option you mention is used in the Linux port to avoid > interference when two sockets are bound to the same port but joined to > different multicast groups. Linux is an outlier in this scenario so the > socket option is set to prevent the interference. My guess is that few > people here will know NonStop but you could being porting questions on > this code to net-dev. > > -Alan -- <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic Consulting Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214>, Mobile: +491737185961 <tel:+491737185961> Oracle Global Services Germany GmbH Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRB 246209 Geschäftsführer: Ralf Herrmann
