On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 21:08:03 GMT, Viktor Klang <vkl...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This Pull-Request implements [JEP-461](https://openjdk.org/jeps/461) > > Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Addressing review feedback > - Make Gatherer.andThen take a wildcard for the rhs Gatherer state type src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Gatherer.java line 267: > 265: * @param <A> the type of the state of the returned initializer > 266: */ > 267: static <A> Supplier<A> defaultInitializer() { Would code sharing imply performance implications due to profile pollution? src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Gatherer.java line 419: > 417: * @return the new {@code Gatherer} > 418: */ > 419: static <T, R> Gatherer<T, Void, R> of( Nit: In `Collector` the parameters are formatted in a different way. Should we be consistent with that existing formatting? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16420#discussion_r1387636158 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16420#discussion_r1387638833
