On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 15:57:40 GMT, Jim Laskey <jlas...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Jim Laskey has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Clean up previous commit > > Things should be fine now. @JimLaskey, I read JEP 463 but couldn't find any statements on access level of an implicit class. `javap` shows that such a class has package access (as I assume it should). Here's the most relevant find in JEP, but it's not about the class. It's about class' members: > An implicit class is almost exactly like an explicitly declared class. Its > members can have the same modifiers (e.g., private and static) and the > modifiers have the same defaults (e.g., package access and instance > membership). One key difference is that while an implicit class has a default > zero-parameter constructor, it can have no other constructor. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16461#issuecomment-1812771590
