On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:38:36 GMT, Pavel Rappo <pra...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Look at the spec https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319252 under 7.3 >> Compilation Units. >> >> - It is not abstract (8.1.1.1 ⇗). >> - It is final (8.1.1.2 ⇗). >> - It is a member of an unnamed package (7.4.2 ⇗) and **has package access**. >> Its direct superclass is Object (8.1.4 ⇗). >> - It does not have any direct superinterfaces (8.1.5 ⇗). >> - The body of the class contains every ClassMemberDeclaration (these are >> declarations of fields (8.3 ⇗), methods (8.4 ⇗), member classes (8.5 ⇗), and >> member interfaces (9.1.1.3 ⇗)) from the simple compilation unit. It is not >> possible for a simple compilation unit to declare an instance initializer >> (8.6 ⇗), static initializer (8.7 ⇗), or constructor (8.8 ⇗). >> -It has an implicitly declared default constructor (8.8.9 ⇗). > > @JimLaskey, in my experiments for JDK-8308715 (Create a mechanism for > Implicitly Declared Class javadoc), I found that > `javax.lang.model.util.Elements.getOrigin` reports `Origin.EXPLICIT` for the > implicitly declared class and `Origin.MANDATED` for that class' constructor. > Shouldn't they both be `Origin.MANDATED` because the elements are created > from source, not class files, which have some limitations on `ACC_MANDATED`? > @pavelrappo Classes can’t be MANDATED. Looking at the code I see that > EXPLICIT is the default return value when no other conditions apply. While it is true that the class file format cannot capture MANDATED status for classes, that doesn't necessarily imply mandated-ness shouldn't be track for classes created from sources while inside javac. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16461#issuecomment-1821055805
