On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:05:51 GMT, Roger Riggs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Strings, after construction, are immutable but may be constructed from
>> mutable arrays of bytes, characters, or integers.
>> The string constructors should guard against the effects of mutating the
>> arrays during construction that might invalidate internal invariants for the
>> correct behavior of operations on the resulting strings. In particular, a
>> number of operations have optimizations for operations on pairs of latin1
>> strings and pairs of non-latin1 strings, while operations between latin1 and
>> non-latin1 strings use a more general implementation.
>>
>> The changes include:
>>
>> - Adding a warning to each constructor with an array as an argument to
>> indicate that the results are indeterminate
>> if the input array is modified before the constructor returns.
>> The resulting string may contain any combination of characters sampled
>> from the input array.
>>
>> - Ensure that strings that are represented as non-latin1 contain at least
>> one non-latin1 character.
>> For latin1 inputs, whether the arrays contain ASCII, ISO-8859-1, UTF8, or
>> another encoding decoded to latin1 the scanning and compression is unchanged.
>> If a non-latin1 character is found, the string is represented as
>> non-latin1 with the added verification that a non-latin1 character is
>> present at the same index.
>> If that character is found to be latin1, then the input array has been
>> modified and the result of the scan may be incorrect.
>> Though a ConcurrentModificationException could be thrown, the risk to an
>> existing application of an unexpected exception should be avoided.
>> Instead, the non-latin1 copy of the input is re-scanned and compressed;
>> that scan determines whether the latin1 or the non-latin1 representation is
>> returned.
>>
>> - The methods that scan for non-latin1 characters and their intrinsic
>> implementations are updated to return the index of the non-latin1 character.
>>
>> - String construction from StringBuilder and CharSequence must also be
>> guarded as their contents may be modified during construction.
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Update PPC implementation of string_compress to return the index of the
> non-latin1 char
> Patch supplied by TheRealMDoerr
test/jdk/java/lang/String/StringRacyConstructor.java line 110:
> 108: for (int i = 0; i < orig.length(); i++)
> 109: accum |= orig.charAt(i);
> 110: byte expectedCoder = (accum < 256) ? LATIN1 : UTF16;
I think this assumes that compact strings are enabled during this test.
test/jdk/java/lang/String/StringRacyConstructor.java line 119:
> 117: for (int i = 0; i < orig.length(); i++)
> 118: accum |= orig.charAt(i);
> 119: byte expectedCoder = (accum < 256) ? LATIN1 : UTF16;
Same as above.
test/jdk/java/lang/String/StringRacyConstructor.java line 190:
> 188: if (printWarningCount == 0) {
> 189: printWarningCount = 1;
> 190: System.out.println("StringUTF16.compress returned 0,
> may not be intrinsic");
It seems to me that the Java code for `StringUTF16.compress` also returns the
index of the non-latin1 char, so I'm not sure I understand this. Just caution?
test/jdk/java/lang/String/StringRacyConstructor.java line 199:
> 197: // Exhaustively check compress returning the correct index of
> the non-latin1 char.
> 198: final int SIZE = 48;
> 199: final byte FILL_BYTE = 0x52;
Suggestion:
final byte FILL_BYTE = 'R';
This makes it more clear that `FILL_BYTE != 'A'` for the logic below.
test/jdk/java/lang/String/StringRacyConstructor.java line 258:
> 256: */
> 257: public static String racyStringConstruction(String original) throws
> ConcurrentModificationException {
> 258: if (original.chars().max().orElseThrow() > 256) {
Suggestion:
if (original.chars().max().getAsInt() >= 256) {
test/jdk/java/lang/String/StringRacyConstructor.java line 288:
> 286: }
> 287: if (i >= 1_000_000) {
> 288: System.err.printf("Unable to produce a UTF16 string
> in %d iterations: %s%n", i, original);
AFAIU, this writes to `System.err` on "success". Is this the intent?
test/jdk/java/lang/String/StringRacyConstructor.java line 300:
> 298: */
> 299: public static String racyStringConstructionCodepoints(String
> original) throws ConcurrentModificationException {
> 300: if (original.chars().max().orElseThrow() > 256) {
Suggestion:
if (original.chars().max().getAsInt() >= 256) {
test/jdk/java/lang/String/StringRacyConstructor.java line 347:
> 345: */
> 346: public static String
> racyStringConstructionCodepointsSurrogates(String original) throws
> ConcurrentModificationException {
> 347: if (original.chars().max().orElseThrow() > 256) {
Suggestion:
if (original.chars().max().getAsInt() >= 256) {
test/jdk/java/lang/String/StringRacyConstructor.java line 400:
> 398: @Override
> 399: public int length() {
> 400: return aString.length() + 1;
Not sure why ` + 1`.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16425#discussion_r1394362549
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16425#discussion_r1394363301
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16425#discussion_r1394378639
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16425#discussion_r1394384444
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16425#discussion_r1394364212
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16425#discussion_r1394411147
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16425#discussion_r1394364741
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16425#discussion_r1394367209
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16425#discussion_r1394368361
