On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 17:25:26 GMT, Mandy Chung <mch...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I haven't looked into the details, but the common case is for jlink users to >> use the default module path (`jmods` folder of the JDK install) and the >> prime use-case for this is to get away with performing a link without the >> packaged modules (no "external" dependency if you will; of that `jmods` >> folder). It could be considered as a follow-up. In this patch I wouldn't >> want to complicate it further if that sounds OK? > > Yes it's fine. We can wait for more feedback and consider this future > enhancement if desirable. I just wanted to understand the reason. Good to > add a comment to explain. Makes sense. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#discussion_r1411149264
