On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:16:29 GMT, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a draft PR with a potential solution to 8328366 without regressing > 8327501. > > @DougLea To avoid regressions in the future, where would regression tests for > this ideally be located? @DougLea @AlanBateman Added a regression test to ForkJoinPool9Test. I think this is the fix we need. Please review. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18374#issuecomment-2009993580
