On Thu, 16 May 2024 07:19:54 GMT, Per Minborg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/lang/StableValue.java line 384:
>>
>>> 382: * @param <T> the memoized type
>>> 383: */
>>> 384: static <T> Supplier<T> ofSupplier(Supplier<? extends T> original) {
>>
>> `ofSupplier` sounds like this method returns a `StableValue` from a
>> `Supplier`. I recommend another name, such as `stableSupplier`,
>> `wrapSupplier`, or `memoize`, to better associate with the method's types.
>
> One alternative would be to expose the types `StableList` and `StableMap`.
> This would allow detection of these types if declared. This would also allow
> us to expose the methods `computeIfUnset` as instance methods and remove the
> somewhat strange static counterparts. I agree strict finals are better in the
> long run.
We had other names for the memoized factories before but some people did not
like names like `asMemoized`.
Maybe `ofSupplier` -> `memoizedSupplier` etc. ?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18794#discussion_r1602754675
