On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 09:04:30 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie <i...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> Does that proposal sound good? >> >> That table is useful, I think it's right. No change to default behavior. If >> someone configures with --enable-runtime-image then they get a JDK run-time >> image that supports jlink (with some limitations) but is significantly small >> as it doesn't include the packaged modules. >> >> I've read through most of the changes now. Overall I think it's looking >> good, just a few terminology and minor points that I'll add as comments. > >> Does that proposal sound good? > > What you basically is saying is that the default value of `packaged-modules` > should be `! runtime-link-image` (i.e. the inverse)? @magicus @erikj79 Do you mind re-reviewing the build changes? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14787#issuecomment-2150590534
