On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:30:52 GMT, Lance Andersen <[email protected]> wrote:
> If this does not make a huge performance difference, I would keep this > together with the init of elen and clen on line 692. I verified this does not cause a regression, so moved the `nlen` read up on the common path. See also my comment to @cl4es re sequential memory access. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20939#discussion_r1753365711
