On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:49:09 GMT, Quan Anh Mai <qa...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/foreign/TestMemorySession.java line 374: >> >>> 372: Thread.onSpinWait(); >>> 373: k = lock.get(); >>> 374: } >> >> I think the right primitive here is a `CyclicBarrier` with 2 parties. Each >> thread will then wait for the other before continuing to the next iteration. > > I'm afraid that it would be too expensive compared to a spinlock, and the > scheduler might not wake up the threads soon enough to make a meaningful > race, greatly reducing the effectiveness of the test. Okay, fair enough. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21810#discussion_r1829533706
