Hi, The change was merged after 23 had already been branched off, so it is destined for 24 as can be seen in the tag associated with the commit (attached).
Cheers, √ Viktor Klang Software Architect, Java Platform Group Oracle ________________________________ From: core-libs-dev <core-libs-dev-r...@openjdk.org> on behalf of Turkhan Badalov <badalov.tur...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2024 16:22 To: core-libs-dev@openjdk.org <core-libs-dev@openjdk.org> Subject: Re: Should the documentation state peekFirst() as equivalent to Stack's peek()? Hi! After this commit https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1846a65e32624f6da691c1072f44fcb762b43233#diff-f7198d7dbc99fe4e161d39db820508c743fe03ecf004085625ab241255c98e76L164, I was expecting the docs to get updated with the release of Java 23. However, the typo is still there: https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/23/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Deque.html Wondering when is the change supposed to take effect or does it mean the fix is not complete? Regards, Turkhan On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:57 PM Chen Liang <chen.l.li...@oracle.com<mailto:chen.l.li...@oracle.com>> wrote: Hi Turkhan, this mail belongs to core-libs-dev list. I have forwarded your mail to the right list. Indeed, we should claim that peek() is equivalent to peekFirst(); the information in stack section should be a typo, as peek() being the same as peekFirst() is claimed by the deque section and the peek() specification. I have created a ticket on the Java Bug System to track this issue: [JDK-8337205] Typo in Stack vs Deque Method table in Deque specification - Java Bug System (openjdk.org)<https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337205> Feel free to open a pull request to jdk to fix this bug. Best, Chen Liang ________________________________ From: jdk-dev <jdk-dev-r...@openjdk.org<mailto:jdk-dev-r...@openjdk.org>> on behalf of Turkhan Badalov <badalov.tur...@gmail.com<mailto:badalov.tur...@gmail.com>> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2024 4:58 AM To: jdk-...@openjdk.org<mailto:jdk-...@openjdk.org> <jdk-...@openjdk.org<mailto:jdk-...@openjdk.org>> Subject: Should the documentation state peekFirst() as equivalent to Stack's peek()? Here is the table "Comparison of Stack and Deque methods" that lists equivalent Deque methods compared to Stack methods: https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/22/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Deque.html At the moment, getFirst() is said to be equivalent to peek(). Since peek() doesn't throw an exception when the queue/stack is empty, peekFirst() could be a better equivalent because getFirst() throws. In fact, the documentation of the peek() method itself says that this method is equivalent to peekFirst(): https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/22/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Deque.html#peek(). If this should be posted somewhere else, please let me know. I am still new to using mailing lists. Cheers.
