On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 20:56:37 GMT, Sean Mullan <mul...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I would prefer if we could deal with getSavedProperty as a wider area follow >> up, since that would creep out of scope for this particular PR. >> >> Ok with you, @liach ? >> >> Perhaps @seanjmullan has input on how to deal with VM.getSavedProperty >> across the code base? > > I prefer to minimize code changes for these cleanup issues. We should file a > separate issue, "Examine usages of VM.getSavedProperty after JEP 486" or > something like that. Thanks Sean, I filed https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8344335 to track this. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22141#discussion_r1844485351
