On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 02:54:36 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I don't know if we have a style guide that covers this, but I believe the 
>> method and field could both be named `isPrimitive`.
>
> I would personally name such a boolean field `primitive`, but I don't have a 
> strong preference on the field naming as long as its references in tests and 
> other locations are correct. In addition, I believe this field may soon be 
> widened to carry more hotspot-specific flags (such as hidden, etc.) so the 
> name is bound to change.

I like 'primitive'.  'hidden' is also a possibility to add to this and give it 
the same treatment.  I didn't do that one here to limit the changes and I 
haven't seen all the calls to isHidden so would need to find out how to measure 
the effects of that change.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23572#discussion_r1961722833

Reply via email to