> Please review this PR which prevents an `AIOOBE` from leaking out when 
> `java.util.Calendar.Builder` is used to build a Japanese calendar with an era 
> value too large.
> 
> Note that we don't check under `BEFORE_MEIJI`/0 as historically Japanese 
> calendar ignores negative values during normalization. See 
> `JapaneseImperialCalendar` L2018: `date.setEra(era > 0 ? eras[era] : null);`. 
> 
> We also check against `eras.length` over `REIWA`/5 due to the possibility of 
> additional eras via the property override or future eras in general.

Justin Lu has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit 
since the last revision:

  Replace 7 w/ more meaningful value

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23789/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23789/files/e55053aa..53a2e3ff

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23789&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23789&range=01-02

  Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23789.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23789/head:pull/23789

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23789

Reply via email to