On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:19:51 GMT, Matthias Baesken <mbaes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> While testing a bit with a minimal JVM, it has been noticed that some
>> java/lang jtreg tests use jfr but do not declare it with a "requires
>> vm.hasJFR" ; that leads to test errors in a JVM setup with no JFR .
>
> Matthias Baesken has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> copyright years
Regarding the requires tags of the tests, I looked a bit more into the jdk
:tier1 tests (when executed with a minimal JVM).
There are ~ 30 com/sun/jdi tests failing - guess they need the jvmti JVM
feature and miss the tag, correct ?
Then there are a few like like
java/util/concurrent/locks/Lock/TimedAcquireLeak.java
java/lang/Class/GetPackageBootLoaderChildLayer.java
jdk/java/util/logging/TestLoggerWeakRefLeak.java
running into this exception
Exception in thread "main" com.sun.tools.attach.AttachNotSupportedException:
The VM does not support the attach mechanism
at
jdk.attach/sun.tools.attach.HotSpotAttachProvider.testAttachable(HotSpotAttachProvider.java:134)
at
jdk.attach/sun.tools.attach.AttachProviderImpl.attachVirtualMachine(AttachProviderImpl.java:54)
at
jdk.attach/com.sun.tools.attach.VirtualMachine.attach(VirtualMachine.java:201)
at jdk.jcmd/sun.tools.jmap.JMap.executeCommandForPid(JMap.java:127)
at jdk.jcmd/sun.tools.jmap.JMap.histo(JMap.java:199)
at jdk.jcmd/sun.tools.jmap.JMap.main(JMap.java:112)
Is here also jvmti required or is it some other JVM feature ?
Btw. I also added as an experiment JVM feature 'management' to the minimal
configuration.
This makes only ~ 1% size difference , on my Linux test system 6272144 (normal
minimal) vs. 6337680 (minimal + management added), but helps a lot of jtreg
tests because java management is needed across tests and jtreg itself;
considering the very small difference it might make sense to add it to default
'minimal' config.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23805#issuecomment-2690724840
