On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:40:56 GMT, Naoto Sato <na...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> It would still need something to indicate that it had failed, as well as a 
>> way to signal other threads that they should terminate early. Worth changing 
>> to an AtomicBoolean?
>
> Ah, ok then. Thanks.

Ok to leave as is? Or is the AtomicBoolean more clear?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24598#discussion_r2045588599

Reply via email to