On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:40:56 GMT, Naoto Sato <na...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> It would still need something to indicate that it had failed, as well as a >> way to signal other threads that they should terminate early. Worth changing >> to an AtomicBoolean? > > Ah, ok then. Thanks. Ok to leave as is? Or is the AtomicBoolean more clear? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24598#discussion_r2045588599