On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:58:21 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink a "TLDR" essay to something concise for readers, such as pointing to
>> that list at `vmIntrinsics.hpp` instead of "a list".
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Updates, thanks to John
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/IntrinsicCandidate.java
line 34:
> 32: * recognized by {@code vmIntrinsics.hpp} and may be subject to
> intrinsification
> 33: * by the HotSpot VM (see {@code LibraryCallKit::try_to_inline} in {@code
> 34: * library_call.cpp}) if an intrinsic is available. Intrinsification
> replaces a
This lead sentence is too long to read conveniently, partly because it is
broken up by a parenthetical.
Suggest:
The `@IntrinsicCandidate` indicates that an annotated method is
recognized by `vmIntrinsics.hpp` and may be subject to intrinsification
by the HotSpot VM. (See `LibraryCallKit::try_to_inline` in `library_call.cpp`
for logic that checks if an intrinsic is available and applicable at a given
call site.)
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24777#discussion_r2054909244