On Fri, 16 May 2025 19:55:58 GMT, John R Rose <jr...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional >> commits since the last revision: >> >> - Move intrinsic to be a subsection; just one most common function of the >> annotation >> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into >> doc/intrinsic-candidate >> - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into >> doc/intrinsic-candidate >> - Update >> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/IntrinsicCandidate.java >> >> Co-authored-by: Raffaello Giulietti <raffaello.giulie...@oracle.com> >> - Shorter first sentence >> - Updates, thanks to John >> - Refine validation and defensive copying >> - 8355223: Improve documentation on @IntrinsicCandidate > > src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/IntrinsicCandidate.java > line 47: > >> 45: * intrinsics necessary. >> 46: * <p> >> 47: * Intrinsification may never happen, or happen at any moment during >> execution. > > s/or happen/or may happen/ (easier to parse) Hello John, are there are any hotspot VM flags that can be enabled to check whether or not intrinsification happen for a particular method during the lifetime of an application? Should any of those flags be documented in this proposed text? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24777#discussion_r2097001318
