On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:48:01 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or >> obsoleted. The non-cffv version can return the preview flags when the >> current runtime is in preview. > > Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The pull request now contains 11 commits: > > - Merge branch 'feature/af-location-accessors' into feature/af-cffv-parse > - Wording updates > - Merge branch 'feature/af-location-accessors' into feature/af-cffv-parse > - Missing since > - Fix javap causing strictfp tests to fail > - Further furnish docs > - Merge branch 'feature/af-location-accessors' into feature/af-cffv-parse > - Merge branch 'feature/af-location-accessors' into feature/af-cffv-parse > - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into > feature/af-cffv-parse > - Redundant method > - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1a22005e...41989440 Unfortunately the cffv-aware maskToAccessFlags introduction and old maskToAccessFlags migration to reject STRICTFP are bundled together - this means javap will need an ad-hoc facility to parse instead of using these APIs. Is that the way to go? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24760#issuecomment-2840096776
