On Thu, 1 May 2025 13:03:47 GMT, Markus KARG <[email protected]> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/AbstractStringBuilder.java line 488:
>>
>>> 486: /**
>>> 487: * {@inheritDoc CharSequence}
>>> 488: */
>>
>> Suggestion:
>>
>> * {@inheritDoc CharSequence}
>> * @param srcBegin {@inheritDoc CharSequence}
>> * @param srcEnd {@inheritDoc CharSequence}
>> * @param dst {@inheritDoc CharSequence}
>> * @param dstBegin {@inheritDoc CharSequence}
>> * @throws IndexOutOfBoundsException {@inheritDoc CharSequence}
>> */
>>
>> Let's aim for text parity for now; can you create a bug for Javadoc for this
>> inheritDoc inconsistency?
>
> I can open a bug report, but I think text parity makes no sense: There are
> lots of other places in OpenJDK where the short form is used already, so
> there will not be any benefit of text parity with just one other code
> location, but it will force us to open another JBS / PR once the bug is fixed
> to come back to the short form. So it brings just work but we gain nothing
> IMHO.
There are subtleties and perhaps surprises in `@inheritDoc`, but that doesn't
necessarily imply the current behavior is buggy.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21730#discussion_r2070475122
