On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:44:26 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This PR proposed to let `ReverseOrderListView::reversed` return `base` so
>> that nested reversed views are avoided.
>
> test/jdk/java/util/Collection/MOAT.java line 507:
>
>> 505: private static <T> void testImmutableSeqColl(final
>> SequencedCollection<T> c, T t) {
>> 506: SequencedCollection<T> r = c.reversed();
>> 507: if (r instanceof List<T> list && list.reversed() != c) {
>
> Shouldn't all double-reverse be identity? Why is this restricted to lists?
This should already be covered by the testDoubleReverse() test in
test/jdk/java/util/SequencedCollection/Basic.java.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25120#discussion_r2080043447
