On Fri, 9 May 2025 20:35:04 GMT, Andrey Turbanov <aturba...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Markus KARG has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 17 commits: >> >> - merge latest from master branch >> - Applied proposal by Daniel: If there's no change to this file the >> copyright year update could be reverted? >> - Applied workaround proposed by Joe: Using component @inheritDoc to >> enforce getChars section in JavaDocs >> - Applied changes proposed by Joe and Jaikiran: Using @inheritDoc to get >> JavaDocs without @since. >> - Applied changes proposed in response to Joe's CSR comments: 'understood >> for CharBuffer; I was thinking more of String, StringBuffer, and >> StringBuilder where there looks to be more textual similarities.' >> - Applied changes requestes by Alan: Aligning unit test for >> CharBuffer.getChars() with unit test for CharBuffer.chars() >> - Applied changes requested by Chen and Jaikiran: Unit tests for default >> implementation of CharSequence.getChars() and for CharBuffer.getChars() >> - Applied changes requested by Chen: 'We might need to specify the IOOBE >> behavior - when an IOOBE is thrown, some characters may be already >> transferred (this is important for concurrent char sequences)' >> - Applied changes requested by Alan: This sentence doesn't make sense, did >> something get deleted? >> - Applied changes requested by Alan: Copies chars from this sequence into >> the given destination array >> - ... and 7 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/b21b3a38...31537b7a > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/CharSequence.java line 313: > >> 311: * at index {@code dstBegin} and ending at index: >> 312: * <pre>{@code >> 313: * dstbegin + (srcEnd-srcBegin) - 1 > > Shouldn't it be dstBegin? > > * dstBegin + (srcEnd-srcBegin) - 1 Hello Andrey, what you note is right. This and the other change you have proposed to this text seems reasonable. Do you want to create a JBS issue and raise a PR proposing this change? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21730#discussion_r2083686557