On Mon, 12 May 2025 23:51:19 GMT, Brian Burkhalter <b...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Implement the requested methods and add a test thereof.
>
> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 21 additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - 8354724: Attempt to further improve verbiage
>  - Merge
>  - Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Reader.java
>    
>    8354724: Apply suggested changes for readAllLines.
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com>
>  - Update src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Reader.java
>    
>    8354724: Apply suggested changes for readAllAsString.
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com>
>  - 8354724: Revert BufferedReader; simplify Reader changes removing 
> overridable self-call; update test
>  - 8354724: Fix potential NPE in test
>  - 8354724: Fix readAllChars gaffe in Reader returned by Readed.of and 
> account for it in test
>  - 8354724: Improve test per reviewer comments
>  - 8354724: Add missing toList(), tweak verbiage; update test
>  - 8354724: Add Reader.readAllLines; test not yet updated
>  - ... and 11 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/fa3173d5...1d811589

src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Reader.java line 430:

> 428:      * <p> The behavior for the case where the reader is
> 429:      * <i>asynchronously closed</i>, or the thread interrupted during the
> 430:      * read, is highly input stream specific, and therefore not 
> specified.

The carry over of this paragraph needs to replace "input stream" with reader 
(same thing in the other method).

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24728#discussion_r2086530955

Reply via email to