On Tue, 13 May 2025 21:28:00 GMT, Jiangli Zhou <jian...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review this PR for skipping 
> jdk/test/lib/process/TestNativeProcessBuilder on static-jdk. Duplicating the 
> context from https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356904 description:
> 
> jdk/test/lib/process/TestNativeProcessBuilder.java (in lib-test/tier1) uses a 
> native test launcher executable, exejvm-test-launcher, which has explicitly 
> dependency on libjvm.so. The test fails on static-jdk. This is the same issue 
> as [JDK-8352276](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8352276). With 
> [JDK-8352276](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8352276), we decided to 
> skip the affected hotspot tier1 tests on static-jdk. We should skip 
> jdk/test/lib/process/TestNativeProcessBuilder.java on static-jdk as well. 
> [JDK-8352305](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8352305) will add tests 
> using custom launcher executable on static JDK.

Changes requested by syan (Committer).

test/lib-test/TEST.ROOT line 31:

> 29: keys=randomness
> 30: 
> 31: # Minimum jtreg version

Shoule we update the copyright year for file TestNativeProcessBuilder.java

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25220#pullrequestreview-2840171571
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25220#discussion_r2088931079

Reply via email to