On Thu, 15 May 2025 06:24:44 GMT, Shaojin Wen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Similar to PR #24982
> Document preconditions on certain DecimalDigits methods that use operations
> either unsafe and/or without range checks.
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/util/DecimalDigits.java line 297:
> 295: */
> 296: public static int uncheckedGetCharsUTF16(long i, int index, byte[]
> buf) {
> 297: // Used by trusted callers. Assumes all necessary bounds checks
> have been done by the caller.
Regarding all methods that are prefixed with `unsynchronized` in this PR, IMHO:
1. Precondition warnings should better be moved to the JavaDoc (ala #24982)
2. We shall also consider implementing these preconditions using `assert`
statements
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25246#discussion_r2092539634
