Side note, I did not find any tests for the VFORK mode. Even the FORK mode seems not that well covered ( we only seem to run java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java in FORK mode)
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 6:59 PM Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am fine with waiting past 25, though the continued existence of this > mode makes me apprehensive. Back at SAP I have seen real customer issues > from these kind of problems, and we only catched those out of accident. > > A separate deprecation for JDK 25 may be a good first step (a warning, but > continued acceptance, of the VFORK mode) > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 6:20 PM Joseph D. Darcy <joe.da...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> I concur that this work is better down early in JDK 26. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Joe >> >> On 5/16/2025 12:26 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote: >> >> Okay, moved the release version to 26. >> >> Could one of you (you or @Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> ) review >> the CSR if you have the cycles to spare? >> >> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357090 >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 7:56 AM Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 16/05/2025 05:10, Thomas Stüfe wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> Thank you, Alan. I will prepare a patch and a CSR. >>> >>> Okay, and maybe something for early in JDK 26 to avoid touching this >>> area close to the fork for JDK 25 RDP1. >>> >>> -Alan >>> >> >>
