This is the deprecation issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357179 Deprecation patch PR: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25282 Deprecation CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357180 Deprecation Release Note: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357181
Cheers, Thomas On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Side note, I did not find any tests for the VFORK mode. Even the FORK mode > seems not that well covered ( we only seem to run > java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java in FORK mode) > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 6:59 PM Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I am fine with waiting past 25, though the continued existence of this >> mode makes me apprehensive. Back at SAP I have seen real customer issues >> from these kind of problems, and we only catched those out of accident. >> >> A separate deprecation for JDK 25 may be a good first step (a warning, >> but continued acceptance, of the VFORK mode) >> >> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 6:20 PM Joseph D. Darcy <joe.da...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I concur that this work is better down early in JDK 26. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -Joe >>> >>> On 5/16/2025 12:26 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote: >>> >>> Okay, moved the release version to 26. >>> >>> Could one of you (you or @Roger Riggs <roger.ri...@oracle.com> ) review >>> the CSR if you have the cycles to spare? >>> >>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357090 >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 7:56 AM Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 16/05/2025 05:10, Thomas Stüfe wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Thank you, Alan. I will prepare a patch and a CSR. >>>> >>>> Okay, and maybe something for early in JDK 26 to avoid touching this >>>> area close to the fork for JDK 25 RDP1. >>>> >>>> -Alan >>>> >>> >>>
